FluoTag®-X4 anti-GFP abberior STAR_STED-optimized.png

Confocal vs. STED images of PFA-fixed U2OS-NUP96-GFP stable cell line stained with FluoTag®-X4 anti-GFP conjugated to abberior STAR RED (left panel, Cat. No. N0304-AbRED-L) or abberior STAR ORANGE (right panel, Cat. No. N0304-AbORANGE-L). FluoTag®-X4 anti-GFP specifically binds to GFP fused to NUP96, enabling the visualization of NUP96 nucleoporins within the Nuclear Pore Complex (NPC). The STED images reveal fine structural details with superior resolution compared to confocal microscopy. Images acquired by abberior.

N0304-JF635B-L_FluoTagX4-GFP

dSTORM image of immunostaining of Cos7 cells expressing TOM70-EGFP fusion protein. TOM70-EGFP reporter was labeled with FluoTag®-X4 anti-GFP coupled to Janelia Fluor® 635b (Cat. No. N0304-JF635B-L). Image courtesy of R. Tsukanov and S. Basak, Institute of Physics – Biophysics, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.

Indirect immunostaining of PFA fixed Hela cells expressing Nup98-GFP with FluoTag®-X4 Atto 565 anti-GFP sdAb (Cat. No. N0304, dilution 1:500, the GFP signal is represented in green, the corresponding FluoTag®-signal is represented in red and the merge of both channels is represented in yellow).

FluoTag-X4 anti-GFP AF647

PFA-fixed Cos7 cells expressing a TOM70-nfGFP-BFP fusion protein (nf: non-fluorescent) were stained with FluoTag®-X4 anti-GFP coupled to Alexa Fluor 647 (Cat. No. N0304-AF647, dilution 1:500). A Greyscale image of the staining performed with N0304-AF647. B False color representation of the image shown in A is displayed in magenta (coloring according to the excitation wavelength of the employed fluorophore). C The corresponding BFP signal of the depicted section. D Merge of A and C. False color representation of A in magenta and C in blue.

FluoTag-X4 anti-GFP AF568

PFA-fixed Cos7 cells expressing a TOM70-nfGFP-BFP fusion protein (nf: non-fluorescent) were stained with FluoTag®-X4 anti-GFP coupled to AZDye568 (Cat. No. N0304-AF568, dilution 1:500). A Greyscale image of the staining displayed with N0304-AF568. B False color representation of the image shown in A is presented in red (coloring according to the excitation wavelength of the employed fluorophore). C The corresponding BFP signal of the depicted section. D Merge of A and C. False color representation of A in red and C in blue.

FluoTag-X4 anti-GFP At488

PFA-fixed Cos7 cells expressing a TOM70-nfGFP-BFP fusion protein (nf: non-fluorescent) were stained with FluoTag®-X4 anti-GFP coupled to Atto 488 (Cat. No. N0304-At488, dilution 1:500). A Greyscale image of the staining performed with N0304-At488. B False color representation of the image shown in A is displayed in green (coloring according to the excitation wavelength of the employed fluorophore). C The corresponding BFP signal of the depicted section. D Merge of A and C. False color representation of A in green and C in blue.

FluoTag®-X4 anti-GFP

Cat No: N0304 Category:

400,00 

FluoTag®-X4 anti-GFP is a blend of two in-house developed single-domain antibodies (sdAbs) that recognize two distinct epitopes on GFP and its most common derivatives with high affinity and specificity. It enables direct and highly specific fluorescent detection of GFP-tagged targets without the need for secondary antibodies.

Read more

General information: A breakthrough in biology and bioluminescence began in the 1960s when Osamu Shimomura and colleagues discovered a glowing protein in the jellyfish Aequorea victoria. This paved the way for fluorescence-based research. However, it wasn’t until the early 1990s that the green fluorescent protein (GFP) sequence was cloned and used as a fluorescent marker in foreign organisms. Today, more than 800 fluorescent protein variants are cataloged in open-source databases, with the most extensive collection available on FPbase.

FluoTag®-X4 anti-GFP is a blend of two in-house developed single-domain antibodies (sdAbs), each binding to distinct epitopes on GFP. Every sdAb carries two fluorophores, decorating GFP-tagged targets with a total of four fluorophores (FluoTag®-X4). This design enhances brightness and detection sensitivity. For more details on our FluoTag®-Q, -X2, and -X4 series, visit our Technology Section.

FluoTag®-X4 anti-GFP binds strongly to most fluorescent proteins derived from Aequorea victoria. Explore our FP Specificity Chart for compatibility information.

NEW: Learn more about our latest variants conjugated to abberior STAR dyes, optimized for STED and confocal microscopy.

Variations:
Conjugation Amount Cat No. RRID
abberior STAR 635P 200 μl N0304_Ab635P-L AB_3075902
abberior STAR 460L 200 μl N0304-Ab460L-L AB_3678866
abberior STAR GREEN 200 μl N0304-AbGREEN-L AB_3678867
abberior STAR ORANGE 200 μl N0304-AbORANGE-L AB_3678868
abberior STAR RED 200 μl N0304-AbRED-L AB_3678869
Janelia Fluor 635b 200 μl N0304-JF635B-L AB_3668671
Atto488 200 μl N0304-At488-L AB_2744629
AZDye568 200 μl N0304-AF568-L AB_3075903
Atto643 200 μl N0304-At643-L AB_3075906
Alexa647 200 μl N0304-AF647-L AB_2905517
Related Products:

sdAb anti-GFP HRP (Cat. No. N0305-HRP)

sdAb anti-GFP Biotin (Cat. No. N0305-Biotin)

FluoTag®-Q anti-GFP (Cat. No. N0301)

Recombinant anti-GFP antibody (rHcAb) Rabbit IgG Fc-fusion (Cat. No. N0383)

GFP Selector (Cat.No. N0310, N0315)

Clone: 1H1, 1B2
Host: Alpaca
Produced in: E.coli
Application:

IF (ICC), IHC

Note: This product is not recommended for detecting proteins in Western blot, as sdAbs tend to recognize native/folded proteins mainly.

Dilution: 1:250 (corresponding to 5 nM for each sdAb clone)
Capacity: N/A
Antigen: -
Targets: GFP
Specificity: Recognizes GFP (green fluorescent protein) and common GFP derivatives like EGFP, mEGFP, Sirius, tSapphire, Cerulean, eCFP, mTurquoise, acGFP, Emerald, superecliptic pHluorin, paGFP, superfolder GFP, eYFP, mVenus and Citrine.
Formulation:

A mixture of two sdAb clones lyophilized from PBS pH 7.4 containing 2% BSA (US-Origin). For more details, click the Protocols button above and check Reconstitution and Storage.

kDa: -
Ext Coef: -
Shipping: Ambient temperature
Storage:

Vials containing lyophilized reagent can be stored at 2-8°C for up to 12 months. After reconstitution, store at -80°C for up to 6 months. Working aliquots can be stored at -20°C for up to 4 weeks. For more details, click the Protocols button above and check Reconstitution and Storage.

Protocols:

Relevant protocols can be found under the Protocols button above. For additional information, visit our Resources page.

References:
  1. Macarrón-Palacios V, Hubrich J, do Rego Barros Fernandes Lima MA, Metzendorf NG, Kneilmann S, Trapp M, Acuna C, Patrizi A, D’Este E, Kilimann MW. Paralemmin-1 controls the nanoarchitecture of the neuronal submembrane cytoskeleton. Sci Adv. 2025 Mar 7;11(10):eadt3724. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adt3724. Epub 2025 Mar 7. PMID: 40053592. (ICC/IF, rat hippocampal primary neurons)
  2. Brunner A, Morero NR, Zhang W, et al. Quantitative imaging of loop extruders rebuilding interphase genome architecture after mitosis. J Cell Biol. 2025;224(3):e202405169. doi:10.1083/jcb.202405169 (ICC/IF, STED; HK cells)
  3. Mougios N, Cotroneo ER, Imse N, et al. NanoPlex: a universal strategy for fluorescence microscopy multiplexing using nanobodies with erasable signals. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):8771. Published 2024 Oct 10. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53030-w
  4. Horton S, Mastrolia V, Jackson RE, et al. Excitatory and inhibitory synapses show a tight subcellular correlation that weakens over development. Cell Rep. 2024;43(7):114361. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114361 (IF; rat hippocampal neurons)
  5. Duan J, Kahms M, Steinhoff A, Klingauf J. Spontaneous and evoked synaptic vesicle release arises from a single releasable pool. Cell Rep. 2024;43(7):114461. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114461 (IF; mouse primary hippocampal culture)
  6. Vicidomini R, Choudhury SD, Han TH, et al. Versatile nanobody-based approach to image, track and reconstitute functional Neurexin-1 in vivo. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):6068. Published 2024 Jul 18. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50462-2 (IHC; STED, fruit fly)
  7. Kashyap P, Bertelli S, Cao F, et al. An optogenetic method for the controlled release of single molecules. Nat Methods. Published online March 8, 2024. doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02204-x (IF/ICC, TIRF)
  8. Hunter I, Coulson B, Pettini T, et al. Balance of activity during a critical period tunes a developing network. Elife. 2024;12:RP91599. Published 2024 Jan 9. doi:10.7554/eLife.91599
  9. Grochowska KM, Sperveslage M, Raman R, et al. Chaperone-mediated autophagy in neuronal dendrites utilizes activity-dependent lysosomal exocytosis for protein disposal. Cell Rep. 2023;42(8):112998. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112998
  10. Raj N, Greune L, Kahms M, et al. Early Endosomes Act as Local Exocytosis Hubs to Repair Endothelial Membrane Damage. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023;10(13):e2300244. doi:10.1002/advs.202300244 (STED)
  11. Degen M, Santos JC, Pluhackova K, et al. Structural basis of NINJ1-mediated plasma membrane rupture in cell death. Nature. 2023;618(7967):1065-1071. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05991-z (STORM)
  12. Otsuka S, Tempkin JOB, Zhang W, et al. A quantitative map of nuclear pore assembly reveals two distinct mechanisms. Nature. 2023;613(7944):575-581. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05528-w (3D STED)
  13. Scheefhals N, Westra M, MacGillavry HD. mGluR5 is transiently confined in perisynaptic nanodomains to shape synaptic function. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):244. Published 2023 Jan 16. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35680-w (dSTORM, PALM)
  14. Bertin F, Jara-Wilde J, Auer B, et al. Drosophila Atlastin regulates synaptic vesicle mobilization independent of bone morphogenetic protein signaling. Biol Res. 2023;56(1):49. Published 2023 Sep 14. doi:10.1186/s40659-023-00462-1 (STED)
  15. Cao F, Deliz-Aguirre R, Gerpott FH, Ziska E, Taylor MJ. Myddosome clustering in IL-1 receptor signaling regulates the formation of an NF-kB activating signalosome. EMBO Rep. 2023;24(10):e57233. doi:10.15252/embr.202357233
  16. Rey S, Ohm H, Moschref F, Zeuschner D, Praetz M, Klämbt C. Glial-dependent clustering of voltage-gated ion channels in Drosophila precedes myelin formation. Elife. 2023;12:e85752. Published 2023 Jun 6. doi:10.7554/eLife.85752
  17. Ghelani T, Escher M, Thomas U, Esch K, Lützkendorf J, Depner H, Maglione M, Parutto P, Gratz S, Matkovic-Rachid T, Ryglewski S, Walter AM, Holcman D, O’Connor Giles K, Heine M, Sigrist SJ. Interactive nanocluster compaction of the ELKS scaffold and Cacophony Ca2+ channels drives sustained active zone potentiation. Sci Adv. 2023 Feb 17;9(7):eade7804. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade7804. Epub 2023 Feb 17. PMID: 36800417; PMCID: PMC9937578. (IHC, STED; fruit fly)
  18. Nunes Vicente F, Lelek M, Tinevez JY, et al. Molecular organization and mechanics of single vimentin filaments revealed by super-resolution imaging. Sci Adv. 2022;8(8):eabm2696. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm269
  19. Mishra K, Fuenzalida-Werner JP, Pennacchietti F, et al. Genetically encoded photo-switchable molecular sensors for optoacoustic and super-resolution imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40(4):598-605. doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01100-5
  20. Ratz M, von Berlin L, Larsson L, et al. Clonal relations in the mouse brain revealed by single-cell and spatial transcriptomics. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25(3):285-294. doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01011-x
  21. Ibarra IL, Ratnu VS, Gordillo L, et al. Comparative chromatin accessibility upon BDNF stimulation delineates neuronal regulatory elements. Mol Syst Biol. 2022;18(8):e10473. doi:10.15252/msb.202110473
  22. Borgmeyer MK. Regulation of synaptic signaling following environmental enrichment and local secretory trafficking in neuronal dendrites. PhD thesis (2022). University of Magdeburg.
  23. Scheefhals N. Living on the edge: The functional organization of metabotropic glutamate receptors at excitatory synapses. PhD thesis (2022). University of Utrecht.
  24. Wiktor J, Gynnå AH, Leroy P, et al. RecA finds homologous DNA by reduced dimensionality search [published correction appears in Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7887):E11]. Nature. 2021;597(7876):426-429. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03877-6 (STED)
  25. Walsh RB, Dresselhaus EC, Becalska AN, et al. Opposing functions for retromer and Rab11 in extracellular vesicle traffic at presynaptic terminals. J Cell Biol. 2021;220(8):e202012034. doi:10.1083/jcb.202012034 (IHC; fruit fly)
  26. Cappelli J, Khacho P, Wang B, et al. Glycine-induced NMDA receptor internalization provides neuroprotection and preserves vasculature following ischemic stroke. iScience. 2021;25(1):103539. Published 2021 Dec 3. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.103539
  27. Klatt O, Repetto D, Brockhaus J, et al. Endogenous β-neurexins on axons and within synapses show regulated dynamic behavior. Cell Rep. 2021;35(11):109266. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109266
  28. Borgmeyer M, Coman C, Has C, et al. Multiomics of synaptic junctions reveals altered lipid metabolism and signaling following environmental enrichment. Cell Rep. 2021;37(1):109797. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109797
  29. Yoo TY, Mitchison TJ. O-GlcNAc modification of nuclear pore complexes accelerates bidirectional transport. J Cell Biol. 2021;220(7):e202010141. doi:10.1083/jcb.202010141
  30. Deliz-Aguirre R, Cao F, Gerpott FHU, et al. MyD88 oligomer size functions as a physical threshold to trigger IL1R Myddosome signaling. J Cell Biol. 2021;220(7):e202012071. doi:10.1083/jcb.202012071
  31. Okazaki M, Kobayashi T, Chiba S, et al. Formation of the B9-domain protein complex MKS1-B9D2-B9D1 is essential as a diffusion barrier for ciliary membrane proteins. Mol Biol Cell. 2020;31(20):2259-2268. doi:10.1091/mbc.E20-03-0208
  32. Krueger D, Pallares Cartes C, Makaske T, De Renzis S. βH-spectrin is required for ratcheting apical pulsatile constrictions during tissue invagination. EMBO Rep. 2020;21(8):e49858. doi:10.15252/embr.201949858 (STED)
  33. Fort-Aznar L, Ugbode C, Sweeney ST. Retrovirus reactivation in CHMP2BIntron5 models of frontotemporal dementia. Hum Mol Genet. 2020;29(16):2637-2646. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddaa142 (IHC; Drosophila)
  34. Hefting LL, D’Este E, Arvedsen E, Benned-Jensen T, Rasmussen HB. Multiple Domains in the Kv7.3 C-Terminus Can Regulate Localization to the Axon Initial Segment. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:10. Published 2020 Feb 4. doi:10.3389/fncel.2020.00010  (STED)
  35. Thevathasan JV, Kahnwald M, Cieśliński K, et al. Nuclear pores as versatile reference standards for quantitative superresolution microscopy [published correction appears in Nat Methods. 2019 Dec;16(12):1332]. Nat Methods. 2019;16(10):1045-1053. doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0574-9  (STED)
  36. Durand A, Wiesner T, Gardner MA, et al. A machine learning approach for online automated optimization of super-resolution optical microscopy. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5247. Published 2018 Dec 7. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07668-y
  37. Ravikumar R, Kalbfuß N, Gendre D, et al. Independent yet overlapping pathways ensure the robustness and responsiveness of trans-Golgi network functions in Arabidopsis. Development. 2018;145(21):dev169201. Published 2018 Nov 7. doi:10.1242/dev.169201 (STED)
  38. Ma M, Kler S, Pan YA. Structural Neural Connectivity Analysis in Zebrafish With Restricted Anterograde Transneuronal Viral Labeling and Quantitative Brain Mapping. Front Neural Circuits. 2020;13:85. Published 2020 Jan 23. doi:10.3389/fncir.2019.00085  (IHC; zebrafish)
  39. West RJH, Ugbode C, Gao FB, Sweeney ST. The pro-apoptotic JNK scaffold POSH/SH3RF1 mediates CHMP2BIntron5-associated toxicity in animal models of frontotemporal dementia. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27(8):1382-1395. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddy048
  40. Hussain A, Pooryasin A, Zhang M, et al. Inhibition of oxidative stress in cholinergic projection neurons fully rescues aging-associated olfactory circuit degeneration in Drosophila. Elife. 2018;7:e32018. Published 2018 Jan 18. doi:10.7554/eLife.32018 (IHC, STED; fruit fly)
Notice: To be used in vitro/ for research only. Non-toxic, non-hazardous, non-infectious.
Legal terms: By purchasing this product you agree to our general terms and conditions.